[July 22, 2026] Islam is currently committing suicide. One of the most uncomfortable questions today is why so many societies in the Islamic world lag behind the West, despite repeated claims of superiority. We begin by noting a core theological contradiction. The Quran is meant to be the final revelation of God to humanity—there is none after it. Previous Biblical religions are absorbed into Islam. For believers, this positions Muslims as recipients of the ultimate truth. Therefore, if you possess the final word from God, follow that prophet, and worship that God, why are Islamic societies underperforming while other societies thrive?
This question strikes at the heart of a central problem within much of the Muslim world. Western success—technological, economic, and social—creates a serious cognitive dissonance for those taught they hold the superior position. Instead of looking inward to identify what they can improve, many turn outward to anti-Westernism, anti-Zionism, and anti-Americanism.
Why is the West so successful across material economics, military strength, and cultural institutions? Not to oversimplify, but free speech is the mechanism of correction. The American Founders wisely recognized freedoms of conscience, speech, worship, and expression as bedrock principles. Without them, the rest could not follow. As John Stuart Mill argued in On Liberty, free speech enables error correction. If errors cannot be openly identified and debated, societies cannot fix them. Without open discourse, Islamic societies often double down on failing policies; whether economic mismanagement, political corruption, or institutional rigidity.
Markets exemplify this adaptability. Western commercial companies are self-correcting because there is no perpetual safety net. Flawed business models lead to failure, and customers migrate to better competitors. Western politicians may accelerate toward disaster, but regular elections allow voters to remove those in error. This dynamic explains why Western systems improve over time while others stagnate. Oil-rich Gulf states, for instance, often mirror medieval European monarchies: wealth concentrated among elites, limited broad-based innovation, and reliance on resource extraction rather than unleashing widespread human talent.
This pattern ties directly to social resentment against the West; a deep and destructive psychological issue. The theological claim of supremacy clashes with observable material outcomes, fostering vulnerability to conspiracy thinking. Failures in governance, corruption, or lack of opportunity are blamed on external forces (Jews, Zionists, America) instead of domestic shortcomings such as suppressed speech, limited religious freedom, or elite capture of institutions and culture. Blaming outsiders for every problem prevents genuine progress. Nobody emigrates to Iran seeking greater freedom of religion. Nobody moves to communist China hoping for a better life. Global “footfall”—the direction of migration—reveals what actually works: Western societies grounded in rule of law, open inquiry, and individual rights.
I must warn of suicidal anti-Westernism growing within the West itself, especially among elites and younger generations who undervalue or actively undermine these very foundations. We risk killing the golden goose by complaining that the gold isn’t golden enough. This analysis is not new. It avoids blanket condemnations of individuals and instead focuses on systemic and psychological dynamics. The “final revelation” mindset, combined with resource curses and suppressed dissent, helps explain persistent underperformance despite available human capital and a rich historical legacy. Reliance on conspiracy narratives becomes a coping mechanism for the dissonance between theological “winning” and material trailing.
For the West, the lesson is urgent: Importing large numbers of people carrying these resentments—while simultaneously eroding domestic free speech through cancel culture or speech codes—risks importing the same stagnation. College students who decry Western “oppression” overlook the obvious reason why people from around the world want to come here. Policymakers should prioritize genuine integration and the preservation of corrective mechanisms such as open debate.
Islamic societies can improve only by moving toward greater openness. Widespread patterns across much of the Middle East and parts of Africa underscore this caution.
Ultimately, the West should champion civilizational confidence rooted in evidence and results. Self-correction through freedom is what distinguishes flourishing societies. Ignoring this reality, whether in the Islamic world or a self-doubting West, courts decline. Facts may unsettle fragile ideologies, but suppressing them guarantees a far deeper failure.
————
Please read my books:
Ouch …. “Self-correction through freedom is what distinguishes flourishing societies. Ignoring this reality, whether in the Islamic world or a self-doubting West, courts decline. Facts may unsettle fragile ideologies, but suppressing them guarantees a far deeper failure.” — “Jelly” 👍
I asked AI Grok to explain and this is part of the answer, which has some merit.
———
The phrase “Islam is committing suicide” (or similar wording like the Muslim world/Ummah self-destructing or imploding) is a rhetorical critique used by some secular/ex-Muslim analysts, historians, and commentators. It is not a mainstream academic consensus but appears in discussions of long-term structural weaknesses in many Muslim-majority societies that could lead to internal decline, stagnation, or collapse despite external resilience (e.g., oil wealth, migration, or ideology).
It typically refers to self-inflicted problems rooted in Islamic doctrine, governance, culture, and demographics rather than solely external factors like colonialism or Western interference. Experts do not usually mean literal mass suicide but systemic failures that undermine vitality, adaptability, and sustainability. Direct quotes matching the phrase exactly are rare in searches, but the underlying arguments recur in works by critics like Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Nicholas Eberstadt (demographics), and others analyzing civilizational challenges.
Economic and Innovative Stagnation (Resource Curse + Anti-Modern Tendencies) Heavy reliance on oil/gas in many states discourages broad-based development, entrepreneurship, and diversification. Low rankings in global innovation, patents, scientific output and education quality (especially STEM vs. rote religious learning) are common critiques. Brain drain: Educated professionals emigrate to the West. Cultural factors: Emphasis on conformity, blasphemy/apostasy taboos, and resistance to critical inquiry are said to hinder progress (e.g., low Nobel prizes in sciences from Muslim world, historical decline post-Golden Age). Critics like Ibn Warraq or Hirsi Ali link this to doctrinal hostility toward “innovation” (bid’ah) and reason when it conflicts with scripture. Go figure.
Great to finally hear from you again, “Jelly.” I’m an old fan of yours because you don’t pull any punches.