[January 31, 2026] Science is changing the way we view our most ancient ancestors, the Neanderthals. In a video by Highly Compelling, he refers to this as the Neanderthal Problem That Scientists Don’t Want to Discuss. The “problem” is that our understanding of human development is wrong.
Why does this matter? Besides setting the record straight, it tells us that science can get it wrong. Science is not settled. And those who believe scientific results dogmatically, and not question the motivations and outcomes of research, can put themselves into the position of an ideologue, and make decisions that could affect the lives of many.
As I was taught back in my early college days, the Neanderthals were a distinct species, an evolutionary dead-end, biologically different, who occasionally interbred with modern humans. They were believed to be physically strong but dimwitted, incapable of adapting to changing environmental conditions, and clannish.
However, recent evidence from genetics and fossil records indicates that this understanding of a Neanderthal knuckle-dragger was dangerously inaccurate. The more we learn about these people, the more the boundary between them and us dissolves.
The Neanderthals were not almost human. They were human, not just in the cultural sense but in the hard biological sense. For example, their mitochondrial DNA is modern human-like in its placement within the human tree. They shared blood group systems. And they interbred with modern humans across large spans of time and geography.
“Neanderthals were not the Martians of Ice Age Europe. They were a western Eurasian human population with a distinctive package shaped by climate drift and long local continuity.” – Highly Compelling
There is a growing consensus that the boundary between Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens is not based on biology but on storytelling, politics, and misunderstandings of old data. This has led us to create a crude caricature of a squat, brutish, biologically alien creature.
The Neanderthal narrative might be changing, and it is, but we need to understand that science is a tool for understanding, not a dogmatic sledgehammer.
————
Please read my books:
This is WILD.
Science is NEVER settled.
…. and now paleoanthropologists are saying that the Out of Africa theory is WRONG. Go figure.
Wow, crazy info. This article seems different than your others for the topic, but I can see you are using the Neanthertals as a way of getting to your point about the not-absolute of science.
Science changes. Don’t believe me? Answer this question… how many planets are in our solar system? Under the International Astronomical Union’s 2006 definition, the answer is eight: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. These bodies satisfy three criteria: they orbit the Sun, possess sufficient mass for hydrostatic equilibrium, and have cleared their orbital neighborhoods.
I was always taught it was nine. Yep, you are spot on.
We’re just ancient students of the “old way of doing things.”
Great content on this one, Gen. Satterfield. “Neanderthals May Never Have Truly Gone Extinct, Study Reveals”
https://www.sciencealert.com/neanderthals-may-never-have-truly-gone-extinct-study-reveals
A new mathematical model has explored a fascinating scenario in which Neanderthals gradually disappeared not through “true extinction” but through genetic absorption into a more prolific species: Us. According to the analysis, the long and drawn-out ‘love affair’ between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals could have led to almost complete genetic absorption within 10,000–30,000 years. WILD.
Ha, very interesting indeed. Gen. Satterfield was misdirecting us initially. Then he makes it about “science” not being what we might think it is. Remember when liberal leftists said that “science was settled?” Well, now we see that it is not. Humans are subject to making mistakes but we are also capable of reevaluating what we do and making corrections. This is what is happening here.
Well said, Boy Sue. Gen. S. Is all over this. And while us “humans” have a brain and a soul, we should not prioritize one over the other. 😆
Lesson learned.
Great points, sir. Thanks. 👍. Made me think!
Yes, well said, Gen. Satterfield. Using our ancient, pre-historical “human” lineage is a great way to get the point over that science, or any hard “fact” might just change as we dig deeper into any subject. Science is not settled, and those who think is, are kidding themselves and are too prone to adopting ideologies that can run counter to their original design.
Most folks will say, at least some on this website writing comments, that no one cares about the Neanderthanl or what they did or didn’t do. But Gen. Satterfield has a point. This narrative of the Neanderthanl is just the vehicle to carry his idea that science is not firm or settled, and to take that argument further, those who think it is are, themselves, the equivalent of today’s Neanderthanls. ha ha ha. Good one Gen. Satterfield.
EXACTLY