[May 29, 2026] Fyodor Dostoevsky wrote in his book, The Idiot (1868-69), “Beauty will save the world.” To emphasize the importance of that point, the famous Alexandre Solzhenitsyn quotes Dostoevsky in his 1970 Nobel Prize acceptance speech. What they meant is that while many things are of the highest importance to us such as truth, love, justice, and the classical virtues, beauty is, perhaps, the foremost among them. And today, we are witnessing a battle over historic beauty.
Paris’s Notre Dame cathedral is currently involved in a legal and cultural battle over its stained glass. Recall the year 2019, when a major fire consumed much of the church. Firefighters and engineers were instrumental in saving much of the physical infrastructure and restoration is nearing completion. One of the miracles was that the historic stained glass windows were untouched by the flames.
However, to commemorate the incident, an idea emerged to replace six of the original windows with new ones. This idea immediately drew criticism from heritage groups. French President Emmanuel Macron and the French government (with Diocese of Paris support) are leading the effort to replace the historic windows.
They want to install contemporary stained-glass windows by artist Claire Tabouret as a modern artistic gesture making the post-2019 fire restoration a “living faith” reminder. It is no surprise that the issue was brought to court, and in a first decision a Parisian court went against the heritage groups.
The argument by historic groups is that per the non-binding Venice Charter, a 1964 international document establishing principles for the conservation and restoration of historic items, only minimal intervention should be used. Replacement is allowed only if the original art is severely damaged, and only if restoration is not feasible.
Artist Claire Tabouret’s vision: Figurative paintings exploring identity, human vulnerability, relationships, childhood enigmas, and collective energy. Uses layered colors (neon under dark tones), expressive brushwork, and materiality for emotional depth and theatrical mystery. Many consider Tabouret’s work as “woke” for his progressive, inclusive themes.
This fight is over more than historic, traditional beauty versus modern progressive beauty themes. This battle over beauty is undecided but it does reflect an on-going shift is the dynamics of government intervention into historic art, and the legendary French people who are weary of President Macron’s intervention into their affairs.
What will be the outcome? The answer is difficult. But, whatever comes out of this battle for beauty may very well impact how societies see their cultural heritage.
————
Please read my books:
Dr. Jordan Peterson’s ideas on responsibility and cultural order shine through this article’s defense of historic beauty. Notre Dame’s stained glass battle highlights the tension between tradition and modern “progressive” impositions. Preserving authentic beauty upholds truth and meaning in a chaotic world. Replacing heritage with contemporary art risks erasing our civilizational roots. Peterson teaches that beauty demands respect and voluntary maintenance. This controversy reveals government overreach into sacred spaces. True leadership protects what elevates the human spirit. Societies thrive by honoring the past’s profound lessons. Let beauty continue guiding us toward responsibility and order.
How “beauty” judges us is a long-running theme of Gen. Satterfield and a worthy discussion that forces us to take a look at what motivates the average person.
Thank you Valkerie for highlighting this insightful theme. Your observation captures the depth of Gen. Satterfield’s perspective beautifully. It’s refreshing to see regular engagement on his ideas. Discussions like this motivate deeper self-reflection. Keep sharing your valuable thoughts!
Well said, Nick. I was going to compliment Valkerie also. 👍