[May 4, 2026] This is an old question, connected to improving our knowledge of the human body and continued advancement in medical technology. Perhaps this is one problem humanity should never solve. Should we eradicate death?
Silicon Valley is pouring billions into curing death. They treat mortality like a defect in a car. Something to be cured from the human system before the next technological leap.
What would happen if they succeeded in eradicating death?
“If you eradicate death, it seems to me that on some fundamental level you also eradicate reality itself.” – Dr. Jordan Peterson
He is not being obtuse. He is describing the load-bearing will of human existence.
Every act of courage this planet has ever witnessed was powered by one undeniable fact. The person performing it knew they were running out of time, that their end was near.
The limitation is not the enemy. The limitation is the engine.
“Evolution has found that it’s better for organisms to have a finite life. Death brings renewal.” – Elon Musk
If the current generation never exits, the next one never enters. Culture stops moving. The same minds running the same thoughts with nothing forcing them to let go.
The technologists look at a human being and see a machine. They believe consciousness is a pattern that can be copied onto a computer server and run indefinitely.
They want to remove the friction of a body that breaks down. They do not understand that the friction is the entire point.
We can apply the coldest law of economics to our own existence. When supply becomes infinite, value collapses to zero. An infinite number of tomorrows makes today mean nothing.
Every painting ever made. Every desperate “I love you.” Every moment a person chose to stand when it would have been easier to quit. All of it exists because the clock was running.
A consciousness with no expiration date is not a higher form of life.
It is just a machine that has not yet been turned off.
NOTE: Thumbnail from “Black Death ‘Plague Pit’ with 48 Skeletons is Extremely Rare Find:” https://www.livescience.com/57092-black-death-burial-pit-discovered.html
————
Please read my books:
I see a future idea developing here in Gen. Satterfield. Expect to see more? Yes.
Gen. Satterfield is right when he warns us not to try to eradicate death. Death is not just an enemy to defeat; it is what gives our lives real meaning and urgency. Without the knowledge that time is limited, people would lose the drive to act with courage or chase big dreams. Every great painting, love story, and brave choice happens because we know the clock is ticking. If no one ever died, new generations could not step up, and fresh ideas would stop flowing into the world. Life would become endless and boring, like a video game with no levels or ending. Gen. Satterfield explains that infinite time would make each day feel worthless, just like too much of anything loses its value. Trying to live forever might turn humans into machines with no real purpose or spark. We should accept death as a natural part of life that pushes us to make the most of every moment. Listening to this warning helps us live better right now instead of chasing impossible immortality.
After reading today’s article “Rules 61: Listen Intently to Your Enemies,” I think this might form itself into one of the future rules as Gen. Satterfield begins to sort out what your death has to do with making you a “good person.” Let’s see how this sorts out over the next few days (or weeks) as he expands his list of “Rules.” Looking forward to it.
Mainer, I was thinking the same thing. I saw your comment today (May 5th) on General Satterfield’s newest “rule.” Correction, not his rule (as he will say) but a rule that has existed for ages, he is just bringing it forward to help us see it and practice it.
Yep!!!! 💯
Gen. Satterfield’s article makes a compelling case against eradicating death. Death fuels courage and urgency in life. Without it, human motivation collapses. Renewal through generations would halt. Infinite life devalues each moment. Culture and innovation would stagnate. Consciousness needs limits to matter. Technology views humans as fixable machines. Embracing mortality preserves what makes us human.
Something to think about. Normally I just avoid the topic altogether.
You gotta see this article. Somehow ties into what Gen. Satterfield is giving us here.
https://x.com/michaelaarouet/status/2050948626126434550?s=61
Now this is indeed an interesting thought experiment. If we did eradicate death, what would be the result? Or, a similar thought experiment, what would the world look like if we were able to extend life expectancy to maybe 200 or 300 years? Now I think we just might have similar results, no need, in other words, to eliminate death, just increase the life expectancy. We see some of those results today as most Western nations have a life expectency in the 80s, some in the low 90s. This is up from 40s just a couple of centuries ago. And look at the results we can see: low birth rates, narcissistic behavior, etc. Just me thinking a little.
Hi Idiot Savant, I asked Grok what the impact would be if we were to increase life expectancy to 200 years old. Here is the answer: Overpopulation, resource collapse, pension/healthcare bankruptcy, slower innovation from reduced generational turnover, and massive inequality. I don’t know if that is right, but surely there is some truth there.
Interesting thought experiment. I wonder about this long ago but gave up on it. Wasted my time because it will not impact me or my family.
WOW